Cloud File Storage Fight: No Knockout Yet

10 IT Leaders To Follow On Twitter10 IT Leaders To Follow On Twitter

Whose world is that this anyway? It’s that point again, the feared close race of superpowers, and not using a clear winner in sight. Where is a degree-headed conservative person imagined to lay his loyalties, fortunes and favors? This isn’t politics I speak of, but document file storage — the exact same fight that years ago gave rise to the mainframe, then personal computers, then kilo-, mega-, giga-, tera- and the scary petabyte.

The creation, use, storage, retrieval and hopefully destruction of the straightforward written word has become a driver of greater than just an economy, it has transformed the very fabric of society. Now anyone with access to a pc, smartphone, etc. can put fingers to keys and start the creation process, ignorant of the magnitude of burden they’re placing at the IT industry.

Dropbox, Box, Amazon Web Services, Hightail (formerly referred to as YouSendIt) and the plethora of systems Microsoft would have us learn, purchase, secure and support are all vying for us to desert our traditional and well-established use of the folder, finder and directory structure. This known albatross on a company’s resources is ripe for drastic change, but which alternative to settle on?

[ Hybrid solution: Egnyte Blends Google Drive, On-Premises Storage. ]

What’s wrong with the present system anyway? Well, it’ll appear that the driving technological shift is size and access, specifically mobile. Today’s wireless platforms scream at greater than 1000 megabits per second. Combine that with regulations that mandate a corporation keep track of all this knowledge, and the safety required with the intention that the inaccurate information (that’s now highly mobile) doesn’t get into the incorrect hands.

It’s hard to assume that my 64-GB company phone can take photos of my kids at 2 MB per photo, and that i can type 50-100 emails an afternoon that every one should be cataloged, stored and saved for eternity. This demand for inexpensive storage and retrieval from virtually anywhere is challenging every paradigm of corporate IT control. When did this ever-evolving creation process become so loose and unchecked?

Dropbox would have us believe that its simple desktop client, which permits anyone to share entire directories with anyone else, around the Internet, at no cost is the way forward for collaboration and ultimately replacement for our file servers.

Box touts its legendary security and tight integration with Windows because the wisest of selections, even going as far as to court healthcare companies.

Amazon simply continues to drop its prices and gobble up data at an alarming rate, but its ease of use, desktop integration and roadmap are a significant concern.

Hightail and the plethora of huge file transfer systems available in the market all capture copies of our data, if just for a brief time period, but enough to cause them to potential future solutions. Today, they mostly fill a niche, transmitting files too large for email, but they’ve begun to compete in other sharing and storage scenarios.

In fact, the behemoth Microsoft, coming off what was seen as a chief success with the discharge of SharePoint 2010, now finds itself verging on irrelevance. It really is cobbling together a technique of mobile apps, SkyDrive, SkyDrive Pro, Office 365 and that thing called Azure. Isn’t that enough to make IT departments scream, “What are you doing to us?”

Last, we must take into account Salesforce.com — arguably not a pure-play file system replacement, but anyone at the Force.com platform can not help but just like the combination of tight security, ubiquitous access, and straightforward management and reporting. It’s enough to make IT professionals drool with anticipation of a single tight platform that embodies the cloud and solves the constraints of current systems.

So it’ll seem that straightforward solutions like Box and Dropbox might want to be contained as threats to giant organizations by reason of their loss of enterprise-class security and auditing capabilities. While Box has these, it operates outside of current administration systems and therefore becomes a burden, rather than embraced as an innovation here to set data free.

Amazon will continue to define cheap storage. It may also bring a needed level of understanding and adoption of information storage that matches its security models.

Microsoft will confound the industry it created by being (all over again) behind the market, looking forward to its partners to innovate on its now mature infrastructure.

Salesforce.com is the odd man out here. It’s scalable, secure and arguably correct to support the mobile and social changes available in the market through its recent acquisitions. But will Salesforce.com carve out file storage as a standalone offering? Or will it just allow its current customers to take pleasure in the goodness of the cloud it invented such a lot of years ago?

For my IBM, Linux and Hadoop friends, there are, without a doubt , those options. But for the regular computer users in corporate America, finding a simple-to-deploy-and-use cloud file-sharing implementation continues to elude us.

Virtual servers have to be backed up just up to physical servers, but they present new challenges and require new technology. Here is what you have to know. Also within the new, all-digital Virtual Backups 101 special issue of Network Computing: Exablox came out of stealth mode recently with a gorgeous scale-out network-attached storage system geared toward the midmarket. (Free registration required.)