Employees resisting social business? You could improve adoption by predicting how these types will react to new ideas.

Has this happened in your company? You introduce a social business platform to great fanfare. You advertise and promote internally, perhaps even sponsoring games and scavenger hunts with the hopes of having your employees fascinated about using it.

At first everything appears to be going great, but eventually usage stalls — even perhaps deteriorates — and also you never reach that critical mass of employee adoption that offers the business benefit you were searching for.

There’s an excellent chance that scholar Everett Rogers and technology consultant Geoffrey Moore may have predicted this example years ago. Within the early 1960s, Rogers developed a theory called the Diffusion of Innovations. If you have ever used the term early adopter, you’ve gotten been talking about this theory without even realizing it. The speculation specializes in understanding the standards which could accelerate or inhibit the spread and adoption of a brand new idea within a community or organization.

[ Want more tips? Read Social Business Adoption: Concentrate on People. ]

I’m on no account the 1st one to make the relationship between diffusion of innovations and social business adoption, but i am hoping to give some simple, practical steps you may take to enhance employee adoption of social business tools and processes. For more in this concept, read Rogers’ book, Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, 2003).

According to Rogers, not everyone has an analogous motivation for adopting a brand new idea. He identifies the next five varieties of adopters:

• Innovators adopt something just because that’s new. They love exploring for the sake of exploring and are willing to take risks, despite the fact that those risks lead to failure.
• Early adopters are frequently opinion leaders. They’re identical to innovators in how quickly they adopt, but they’re more all for the chill factor and maintaining their reputations as being sooner than the curve on new ideas.
• Early majority and late majority are the critical mass that ensures adoption. The early majority looks for productivity and practical benefits greater than coolness or reputation. The late majority is the same but additionally expects a number of help and support before they may be willing to commit.
• Laggards, because the term implies, are slow to adopt. They’re the foremost immune to change and accomplish that only when forced to adopt because everyone else has.

About 30 years after Rogers completed his research, Geoffrey Moore wrote Crossing the Chasm. While the book makes a speciality of how the diffusion-of-innovations theory can be utilized for marketing high-tech products to customers, lots of its ideas is usually applied to the interior adoption of social business. In actuality, i believe Moore’s “chasm” is the crux of many social business failures. The chasm he describes is the distance between the early adopters and the early majority.

It’s easy to work out ways to use innovators to draw early adopters, and an identical goes for using the early majority to draw the late majority. These adjacent types are relatively identical to one another. In fact, the laggards will come around eventually, if only as a result shift in cultural momentum.

But that pesky gap between the early adopters and the early majority is the true killer. How do you’re taking something that’s attracting users because it’s new and funky, and reframe it in order that it attracts users because it’s useful and valuable — especially if the genuine value comes from fundamental behavior change, not only tool adoption? What if playing up the thrill, cool aspect might actually be detrimental to attracting employees who’re pragmatic and practical?

In my next article I’ll discuss what steps the concept recommends to facilitate adoption and describe a streamlined model I’ve utilized in my very own company that will help you understand when and where to shift your focus as you move along the adoption curve.

Among nearly 900 qualified respondents to our 2013 Mobile Commerce Survey, 71 percent say m-commerce could be very or vitally important to the way forward for their organizations. However, just 26 percent have comprehensive strategies in place now. That spells opportunity. Discover more within the 2013 Mobile Commerce Survey report. (Free registration required.)

More Insights